Ruined Manor and stables

Derelict Places

Help Support Derelict Places:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

tumble112

Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
1,778
Location
Greater Unthank
This is Milkbank House, built in the 19th century for the Bell-Irving family who were wealthy Glasgow merchants.
The house took its name from the strangely named Water of Milk river which flows just a coule of hundred yards to the east. ( Castle Milk house which is still inhabited sits a mile and half to the east of here was used as a location in the 1979 film version of The 39 Steps).
History of te house is scarce but it would appear that the building was requisitioned for use during WW2 and afterwards the family either refused, or could no longer afford to live here. The house lay derelict until 1960, when the roof was removed. Some websites mistakenly say the house was demolished then.
I have included the stable/kennel block as well and also the attached house which seems to have been lived in until the 80's or 90's.
More here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/107793356@N06/sets/72157644246353966/

The old girl in her prime

14024731256_bf55700289.jpg
download by tumble112, on Flickr

13982818516_b8be22e3e0_b.jpg
028 by tumble112, on Flickr
14005990185_cec28675cd_b.jpg
021 by tumble112, on Flickr
14025991723_46e7c2ddff_b.jpg
022 by tumble112, on Flickr
14005954265_e1379b3106_b.jpg
025 by tumble112, on Flickr
14005939285_e49867e675_b.jpg
027 by tumble112, on Flickr

I can imagine the servants having to keep this mosaic floor clean
14002745992_527b37df1e_b.jpg
026 by tumble112, on Flickr

Stable/kennel block

14025795183_1f78567e93_b.jpg
001 by tumble112, on Flickr

003 by tumble112, on Flickr
14025764273_851e51c457_b.jpg
005 by tumble112, on Flickr
14006177504_e0eb2ba9da_b.jpg
009 by tumble112, on Flickr
14025721763_a011e53732_b.jpg
012 by tumble112, on Flickr
14005695605_03014077b9_b.jpg
014 by tumble112, on Flickr
14005689465_3b3a8e5a69_b.jpg
015 by tumble112, on Flickr
14002497121_2377a7a915_b.jpg
017 by tumble112, on Flickr
14002473242_60d7b784f1_b.jpg
018 by tumble112, on Flickr
13982789766_9e415f8468_b.jpg
031 by tumble112, on Flickr

Thanks for looking.
 
This house was one of a fairly large number, where the pre-war residents/owners complained to the then War Ministry about the state they found the interior in when the building was returned to them. Don't know the extent of the damage here, but in other well documented cases the wartime residents pulled up wooden floors and removed wooden panelling to use as fire wood. Roof was removed in 1960 to remove the liability for Rates and any other duties that might be owing on a habitable residence.
 
This house was one of a fairly large number, where the pre-war residents/owners complained to the then War Ministry about the state they found the interior in when the building was returned to them. Don't know the extent of the damage here, but in other well documented cases the wartime residents pulled up wooden floors and removed wooden panelling to use as fire wood. Roof was removed in 1960 to remove the liability for Rates and any other duties that might be owing on a habitable residence.

Thank you. History on this house is quite hard to come by and I am not native to this area so my write up was rather patched together. I did come across one mention of the wartime inhabitants leaving the building in such a state that the family refused to live here after the wars end but was unsure if this was accurate, but what you say here backs this up. I had never heard of this before but it appears to have been a relatively common occurence.
 
tumble1;286426 I did come across one mention of the wartime inhabitants leaving the building in such a state that the family refused to live here after the wars. I had never heard of this before but it appears to have been a relatively common occurence.[/QUOTE said:
Very common, especially where the country mansions and grounds were used to house whole Units/Companies of a Regiment. Where the building was used as a Regimental HQ and housed offices and radio command post etc, any damage reported when ownership was returned to civilians seems to have been minimal at worst. i.e. floors marked by army boots or the odd broken wall mirror or damaged mural/painting. However houses used by allied troops who escaped prior or during Dunkirk and property used by our allies during the build up to D-Day really suffered. In some respects one can understand the wholesale cutting down of ornamental trees and chopping up floor boards and wooden wall panelling for fire wood in the period after Dunkirk, the whole country was in turmoil. ( My mother used to tell of seeing whole lines of bedraggled French Troops, some colonial, trudging along the top of our road in Doncaster on their way from the Station to temporary accommodation on the Race Course. She never could forget the look of sheer helplessness on many of the faces). The damage to properties used to house the build up for D-Day seems harder to reconcile - but then these were young men, an ocean away from their home countries and doing something that people of my generation have never been forced to do. So I am in no position to judge.

In the broad scheme of things, the loss of a bit of wainscotting or a latrine being dug in the rose terrace (I kid not) of a house, was nothing compared to the horrors that went on in occupied Europe. At least these people had property and land to come back to. Many of the books written about the country mansions of the UK over recent years do sometimes mention the wartime histories and what happened to the fabric.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top